Redfield, Blonsky Home Page 

 

 

Marvel Enterprises, Inc

MVL

Investment Notes

 

 

 

October 20, 2003 

 

1.  Marvel raised guidance on October 9, 2003  .  Marvel cited strength of licensing division (high margin).

 

June 16, 2003 

 

 

From 2002 10K

 

1.  Cash flow statement shows option exercise cash benefit (that is $$$$ that employees pay for shares that were optioned).  Total was $1.198 Mil.  Need to find out how many shares that was, then compute market cap of it and dilution stuff.

 

2.  Stock Based compensation for F2002 was around .02.  Need to see more for F2003, and find out if larger projected number is expected.

 

 

 

3. Perlmutter owns the company which places advertising for Marvel. Called Tangible Media Inc.  See if any info on this company, such as profitability, diversity of customers (or is it just Marvel), any sec filings etc. I think the fees in 2002 were only 102k (previously higher)

 

4.  Need to review status of all lawsuits.

 

a.      Marvel vs. Simon (10k says non-jury to start 7/16/03. suit claims that Capt. America was created as work for hire.

 

b. Stan lee and Marvel.... I really need to read up on this. What is exposure? It seems that if Stan Lee were to prevail he would get a 10 % profit participation in Spider Man movie and other film and productions that use Marvel Characters.  I need to research the analysis here, if Lee prevails what would ultimate payment and accrual be. How much revenue was previously recognized that would need to be offset with costs.  Mr. lee does have an employment agreement that is paying lee a salary of 1 mill per year.

 

5. Page 9 of the F2002 10k has Equity Compensation plan. 4,542,916 mil of securities remain available for future issuance at 5 $ per share.  Market cap at today’s price ($22) on those shares would be near $100 million

 

7.  Definitely need to scour Sony SEC documents and see all mentioned about Equity Joint Venture.

 

8.  Has Perlmutter exercised his warrants? As of 10k F2002, he was entitled to 3,867,708 shares at a price of 3.11 for 5 years, effective 11/30/01.

 

  Perlmutter personally guaranteed 4.4 million for lease of office facility. Looks like he was given warrants to exercise 735,601 shares at a price of 3.11 for 5 years, effective 11/30/01.  In total he is entitled to 4,603,309 shares. Have these been exercised, has the diluted shares been accounted for in eps.

 

9.  Does company do business with Object Trading Corp, a wholly owned company by Perlmutter?  Company was discussed in 3/31/03 10Q.

 

 

10. As of 12/31/02 there were 10,843,502 of exercisable options.

 

11. 3 largest customers at 12/31/02 accounted for 15 %, 9 % and 4 % of total net sales.  Who were these customers?

 

12.  Will SARS affect Marvel because of TBW? How will weak dollar affect MVL?

 

13.  Related party transactions exist with Avi Arad (BOD and stockholder) for royalties for 685k in 2002. He has an affiliate production company, which was paid $300k in 2002.  Company shares office space and G&A with affiliates, cost was about $83K in 2002.  Company paid producer fees to a company wholly owned by an officer of 202 in F2002.  Who is the officer, what is the company?

 

14. Company has a defined benefit pension plan.   FYI this is a plan generally very beneficial for older employers. I need to ask actuary if this is very beneficial to Marvel because of officers who are older.  Company is using actuarial assumptions of 6 % (previously 7 %) discount rate, expected rate of return 8 % (previously 9%), get copy of 5500's and greater than 5% net assets for Plan benefits.  Look for related party investments. Watch the unfunded portion. What is expected to be paid over time? Has this been discussed in CC's.

 

 

Review of 8k from May 6, 2003

 

1.       If I am reading correctly I see that Marvel is unofficially guiding that revenue breakdown in future to be

 

10 % or less from Films

57 % Licensing

 

I didn’t get more of a breakdown and need to review the above for completeness and accuracy.

 

2.       Insider Ownership (this is from proxy statement filed in April, not the 8 k)

 

Beneficial Owner.... Beneficially Owned.... Percentage Owned

 

 

Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (1) ....................... 6,314,238 9.70%

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

Avi Arad (2).................................................................. 5,250,000 7.93%

F. Peter Cuneo (3) ......................................................... 1,120,000 1.69%

Alan Fine (4) ................................................................. 515,000 *

Sid Ganis (5) ................................................................ 85,000 *

James F. Halpin (6) ....................................................... 135,000 *

Morton E. Handel (7) .................................................... 166,000 *

William Jemas, Jr. (8) ................................................... 336,667 *

Allen S. Lipson (9) ....................................................... 372,667 *

Lawrence Mittman (10) ................................................ 105,000 *

Isaac Perlmutter (11)..................................................... 26,692,941 36.22%

Richard L. Solar (12) .................................................... 24,500 *

Richard E. Ungar (13)................................................... 190,000 *

All current executive officers and directors as a group

(13 persons) (14)..................................................... 35,042,775 45.05%

_________

* Less than 1%.

 

 

 

According to the 8k, officers will be selling approx 3 mil shares.  During CC it was mentioned that Ike is not intending to currently sell shares (they did say, " to the best of their knowledge").  I forget where I read, but those insiders will still hold 67 % of their position and getting rid of 1/3. Need to find out if either Ike or Morgan Stanley have restrictions on sales.

 

3. Avi stated that gross participation deals generally range from 2% to 7%; not talking about box office, because gross participation is based on Revenues studio receives (this was mentioned on the last question of the CC)

 

 

Some notes from other readings

 

 

1. My understanding is that MVL guided before 1/14/03 that F2003 projected shares outstanding would be 73.7m, now they project 75.8 mil.

 

2. F2003 projected revenues were originally guided at $205 - $ 215 mil before 1/14/03, now they project $ 225 - $ 230 mil.

 

3. F2003 projected Free Cash Flow per Share was originally guided at $69 74 mil before 1/14/03, now they project $ 80 - 90 mil.

 

4. F2003 EPS was originally guided at $42 - 45 mil before 1/14/03, now they project $ 74 - 82 mil..

 

5.  Company guidance on dilution will be interesting.  Need to determine if increase in stock price has caused more options to be in the money, which could increase share count.

 

6. Early retirement on debt is interesting. Again, I need to look closer. Buying the debt at distressed levels looks like a great move.

 

7. Need to research (if possible) the financial Strength of Toy Biz Worldwide; LTD. (TBW) The company generates 77 % of sales from US retailers (Toy Biz is an unaffiliated Hong Kong entity). Retail Distributors are WMT, TOY, Kay bee and Target.

 

8. Routh estimated 1/14/03 that MVL received a royalty of 20 % on wholesale sales of TBW.

 

9. Routh in 1/14/03 report projected gross box revenues for future films as follows.

 

Prime*** 254m

Nick Fury***175m

The Punisher***175m

Iron Fist***225

 

 

Total gross of past films per same report were

 

MIB***577

Blade***131

X-men***315

Blade II *** 150

Spider man***825

MIB II*** 426

 

 

10. Need to review SNE for any upward or downward guidance. Need to read their take on Spiderman Joint Venture. Accounted for under equity method.  I need to learn more about the SNE lawsuit.  According to something I read ( I forget where) looks like MVL on upside could benefit by 50 m, or 0.63 per share, plus better potential deals. If they lose, just lose costs. Again, real weak here, have to read up.

 

11. I would like  to find out if employees and lesser level employees receive options. If so, are they selling as well? Sometimes companies discourage employees from selling, yet high levels sell anyway. Examples that I know of in this are STAD, LU and Enron. I have no reason or even suspicion that Marvel is doing anything as such.

 

12. Tangible book value when removing goodwill is near 0.  In a webcast on June 16, 2003,  Avi explained that tangible book value is meaningless to Marvel. 

 

13. Price to sales ratio, using F2003 revenues of $230 million and a price of $ 21, would be 6.93X.

 

 

Price to Sales is just one of many tools. You also need to project out to normalized long term revenues, so you could see what price to sales or any other metric might be when revenue streams are at their expected level. For example, Amazon and Home Depot in its infant stage. When one looked at Amazon in the early days, price to sales was huge, but that was on 1 mil or so of revenues, one could have projected out and questioned, " what would price to sales be on 1 billion of revenues". There is a company I am investing in now, with next to no revenues, the hopes are that the company will have 200 mil plus, hence if that happens, current price levels would be absurdly low.

 

14. Some projected items I found in Routh Report from 5/29/03

 

Year***Revenues****Gross Profit***eps

 

2002A***299.08***156.93***(1.18)

2003E***238.66***164.84***1.11

2004E***317.16***198.34***1.13

2005E***234.94***188.40***1.25